Plate Nº 64 · recorded October 10, 2026
Biology & EvolutionReported finding
Bat Genomes Reveal Why Some Species Live 50 Years Without Cancer
The first analysis of eight Myotis bat genomes ties extreme longevity to immune function, with long-lived bats showing more cancer-fighting genes and a radical strategy of killing damaged cells.
By James Calloway6 min read1,207 words
In brief
- A Brandt's myotis banded in Europe was recaptured 50 years later, while a related species, Myotis nigricans, lives only about seven years.
- Researchers published the first analysis of eight Myotis bat genomes in Nature on September 11, 2026.
- Longer-lived bats carried higher levels of genes associated with fighting cancer.
- The study covers 259 individual bats from 32 species kept as cell cultures by researcher Juan Manuel Vazquez.
- Bats make up 20% of all mammal species and have existed for roughly 60 million years.

A small bat can live 50 years without getting cancer, and its genome may explain how. In a study published in Nature on September 11, 2026, researchers at the University of California, Berkeley present the first analysis of eight genomes from the genus Myotis, and their results tie exceptional longevity directly to immune function.
The longer-lived bats in the study carried higher levels of genes associated with fighting cancer. The findings suggest that a long life may depend in part on an immune system that stays highly effective against both infectious organisms and cancer, even in old age.
Why study bats for clues about human aging?
Bats survive for remarkably long periods relative to their body size. Among the 1,511 known bat species, about 139 belong to the genus Myotis, and closely related species can have dramatically different lifespans.
Brandt's myotis (Myotis brandtii) can survive for half a century. One individual banded in Europe was recaptured 50 years later. The black myotis (Myotis nigricans) of South and Central America lives only about seven years.
Lead researcher Juan Manuel Vazquez compared the contrast to a hypothetical world in which our close relative, Homo neanderthalensis, lived nine times longer than modern Homo sapiens.
The idea of bat longevity fascinated Vazquez while he was a graduate student at the University of Chicago. At the time, little published genomic information about bats existed. After joining UC Berkeley as a postdoctoral fellow in 2020, he traveled across the Western U.S. with help from Berkeley undergraduates, setting up mist nets over streams, ponds and rivers at night. The team captured bats, collected small tissue biopsies and released the animals.
What did the genomes show?
The analysis revealed substantial overlap between genes associated with aging and genes involved in disease defense. Studying one process could help explain the other, the researchers say.
Whenever Vazquez identified a gene associated with bat lifespan, his collaborator Elise Lauterbur, then at the University of Arizona, had often identified the same gene as one involved in interactions between bats and viruses.
"There is way more overlap than you would expect just by random chance between the genes that are associated with longevity and genes that are associated with viral interactions," Vazquez said.
The team also found that Myotis bats possess an unusually large number of genes that produce proteins interacting with DNA viruses, such as herpes viruses, which carry their genetic information in DNA. Those proteins can either assist viral infection or help protect the animal. One protective function can involve increasing production of interferon, an antiviral signaling protein that helps coordinate immune defenses.
This pattern differs from humans and other primates, which tend to have more genes producing proteins that interact with RNA viruses, including viruses such as COVID and HIV.
"DNA viral interacting proteins were strongly enriched for selection in bats in contrast to most other mammals, where there is a very strong enrichment for selection for both DNA and RNA viral interacting proteins," said Peter Sudmant, a Berkeley associate professor of integrative biology who studies the genetics of aging and lifespan.
How do bat cells respond to severe damage?
Vazquez grew cells collected from bat wing biopsies in the laboratory — he currently maintains cell cultures from 259 individuals representing 32 species — and exposed the cultured cells to toxic chemicals to observe how they responded to severe damage.
The longest-lived bat in his sample, the widespread little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus), reacted unexpectedly. Instead of switching on genes that produce DNA repair proteins, the cells increased the activity of genes that promote cell death.
"We found the literal opposite of what we expected if you treat the bats with a lethal dose of this chemical," Vazquez said. "The longest-lived bat in North America decides 'I can't save this ship' and immediately switches gears to prioritize killing off the cells that are damaged. The elephant, another cancer-resistant species that is long-lived, has the exact same strategy — if you can't save the cell, kill the cell."
The result suggests that animals have evolved very different strategies for preventing damaged cells from becoming dangerous, and understanding those strategies could provide valuable clues about longevity.
Could bats inspire new human therapies?
Vazquez argues that the findings blur the line between two fields usually treated separately.
"Bats evolved to live for a long time without getting diseases, which suggests that we don't necessarily need to look at diseases of aging and diseases of infection as completely separate fields," he said. "We can look at these bats and try to understand how, in the same way you can improve your immune system to fight off viruses, maybe you can improve your immune system so it doesn't decline in old age."
The researchers urge caution, though. These are preliminary genomic findings, and any translation into human medicine remains far off. The study establishes correlations between genes and lifespan; it does not yet demonstrate causal mechanisms.
Still, the long evolutionary view is promising. Bats first appeared about 60 million years ago and now account for 20% of all mammal species, occupying habitats on every continent except Antarctica. Their immune systems operate at an unusually high level, helping them control damaging inflammation while living with persistent viral infections without becoming sick.
Researchers have proposed that this immune strength may connect to bats' intense physical activity. Vazquez compares the nightly flights bats make while hunting insects to running several ultramarathons every day.
"Bats have evolved this incredible fitness capacity, this incredible ability to deal with disease and this incredible ability to be able to prevent cancer," he said. "That means that, by understanding how bats have evolved to do all these things that other mammals haven't, we can find completely new and unexpected ways of dealing with the normal things that cause human diseases."
Why can bat viruses be dangerous to humans?
The evolutionary mismatch between bat and human immune defenses could help explain why some viruses that move from bats into people cause serious zoonotic diseases. Healthy bats host an extraordinary variety of viruses, some of which — including viruses related to the cause of COVID-19 — can spill over into humans.
"Humans and bats are badly suited to each other," Vazquez said. "That is one of the reasons why we have to be careful working with bats — it's a two-way street for zoonoses. We don't want to give the bat something and we don't want to get something from the bat."
What comes next?
Vazquez is continuing to investigate the genetic mechanisms that control longevity using cell cultures in his new faculty position at Pennsylvania State University. Sudmant is focusing on how those cells regulate their immune responses.
"One thing that I'm really excited about is the trade-off between how a bat protects itself by producing proteins that attack the genomes of viruses but also protects its own genome from being attacked by those proteins," Sudmant said.
Other co-authors of the paper include Lucie Etienne of the École Normale Supérieure in Lyon, France, and David Enard of the University of Arizona in Tucson. The National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation funded the work.
via dx.doi.org (Original)
More from James Calloway
Show full bio
Staff writer covering marketplaces and e-commerce at SciBeat.
205 articles
Nearby plates
- Bats First Evolved in Europe 65 Million Years Ago, Genome Study Finds
- Bats Carry a Double Antibody System No Other Mammal Has
- Immune System Ages in Bursts Around 40 and 60, Study Finds
- Semaglutide Extended Mouse Lifespan by Nearly 100 Days, NIH-Funded Study Finds
- Aurochs Went Extinct in Scandinavia Under Multiple Pressures at Once, DNA Shows