Plate Nº 98 · recorded October 10, 2026
Science Policy & FundingReported finding
NSF Releases $1.5 Billion Across 12 New Research Grant Programs
The U.S. National Science Foundation released 12 funding notices worth more than $1.5 billion, reshaping its basic-research portfolio to back longer projects and faster experiments.
By Nathan Brooks3 min read660 words
In brief
- NSF released 12 funding notices worth more than $1.5 billion for basic research across science and engineering.
- Researchers may now request up to five years of support for ambitious, long-horizon questions, instead of shorter traditional cycles.
- Brian Stone, performing the duties of NSF Director, said the package will let researchers "accelerate fundamental research."
- White House science adviser Michael Kratsios said awards will be "matched to the character of the research."
- NSF plans to treat the rollout as a structured experiment, rigorously assessing whether the new approach improves scientific output.
The U.S. National Science Foundation released 12 new funding notices today worth more than $1.5 billion combined, widening the field of who can compete for federal basic-research money and reshaping how long the awards will last.
The notices — officially Notices of Funding Opportunity, or NOFOs — cover basic and "use-inspired" inquiry across science and engineering. NSF calls the package its implementation of the administration's FY 2028 R&D priorities memo, "Ushering in a New Golden Age of American Innovation." It also follows through on the companion report "Science: A New Golden Age."
What does the agency want to fund?
Each NOFO addresses a different slice of the research enterprise, but three priorities run through all 12. NSF said the portfolio will emphasize:
- Bold, paradigm-challenging work
- Projects that bridge disciplines that rarely collaborate
- Research that harnesses artificial intelligence, advanced computation, or automation to enable experiments older methods cannot support
"Rather than treating every research question alike, NSF will take a portfolio-based approach to federal grantmaking," the agency wrote. The approach matches funding mechanism, institutional model, and award length to the type of science being done.
How long can the awards last?
This is one of the most concrete shifts. Researchers may now request up to five years of support for ambitious, long-horizon questions. NSF framed the change as a way to let investigators pursue "truly paradigm-shifting research instead of producing incremental results to secure the next award."
To balance the long bets, the agency is encouraging grantees to make greater use of existing short-term rapid grants that quickly test or kill a fresh idea.
Who is leading the effort?
Brian Stone, Performing the Duties of the NSF Director, framed the package in directly competitive terms.
"America's scientific enterprise is shaped by how we empower researchers to explore the frontiers of discovery," Stone said. "The investment that we are announcing today will enable researchers to accelerate fundamental research, giving rise to the transformational breakthroughs that will power our future."
White House science adviser Michael Kratsios tied the move to broader industrial policy.
"In Science: A New Golden Age, the administration made foundational research in the sciences and engineering a national priority," said Kratsios, Assistant to the President and Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. "NSF's investments today ensure the United States continues to drive the scientific breakthroughs that underpin the industries of the future and will support a wider range of meritorious science by matching the size, speed and duration of an award to the character of the research it supports."
What is the experiment within the experiment?
NSF plans to treat the rollout as a structured study of its own. The agency will "rigorously assess and validate" whether changes to proposal design, award duration, review methods, and funding speed actually improve the ambition and quality of resulting science.
If the data support the changes, NSF says it will scale them over time. The plan echoes "metascience" — the study of how research itself is funded, reviewed, and communicated — a theme central to the FY 2028 memo.
What about new or unconventional labs?
The new solicitations are shorter, fewer in number, and easier to navigate than past calls, NSF said, an effort to open its funding to a broader cross-section of the country and reduce paperwork burden.
The shift accompanies a merit-review pilot NSF announced last winter. That pilot adds pathways to surface unconventional proposals that traditional consensus panels often filter out. Early-career researchers are encouraged to apply across all 12 NOFOs.
What remains uncertain
The package assumes congressional appropriations for FY 2028 will materialize. The new five-year awards also depend on peer reviewers tolerating higher-risk applications — a cultural shift past NSF attempts have struggled to enforce.
Outsiders will need NSF to publish evaluation data before judging whether the portfolio model produces more high-impact science than the agency's prior approach.
via whitehouse.gov (Original)
More from Nathan Brooks
Nearby plates
- New NSF Grants Have Slowed to a Trickle — But Relief May Be Near
- NSF Unveils New Metascience Office and $300 Million X-Labs Push
- National Science Foundation's Future in Limbo as Trump Eyes Cuts
- Trump Proposes Deep Research Cuts, New Icebreaker for NSF
- NSF Plans Cuts to Core Science Programmes for White House Initiative