Plate Nº 12 · recorded November 14, 2026
Health & Medicine ResearchReported finding
Two Genes Linked to Painful Pseudogout in Study of 550,000 Genomes
A genetic study of 550,000 veterans links ENPP1 and RNF144B to pseudogout, opening two possible routes to treatments that stop crystals forming. Both need years of testing.
By James Calloway4 min read710 words
In brief
- Researchers scanned genomes of more than 550,000 people in the U.S. Million Veteran Program
- The study linked two genes, ENPP1 and RNF144B, to calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease
- Signals appeared in both European-ancestry and African-ancestry participants
- Current drugs treat pain and swelling but do not remove deposits or stop new crystal formation
- The study was published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
A scan of more than 550,000 genomes has turned up two genes, ENPP1 and RNF144B, linked to the painful joint condition doctors call pseudogout. That's the headline. The caveats come thick and fast behind it.
The study, published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, drew on the U.S. Million Veteran Program and was reported by VA Million Veteran Program and Mass General Brigham. Researchers compared the DNA of people diagnosed with calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease — CPPD for short — against people with no such diagnosis, hunting for genetic variants that cropped up more often in the CPPD group.
The signals near both genes appeared in participants of European ancestry and, separately, in participants of African ancestry. That repetition across two ancestry groups matters. It suggests the findings aren't an artifact of one population's genetic background.
What is pseudogout, exactly?
CPPD happens when calcium crystals build up in joints. When those crystals trigger sudden inflammation, the joint can turn hot, swollen and extremely painful. The attack resembles gout — hence the nickname pseudogout — but the crystals are made of a different substance: calcium pyrophosphate rather than the uric acid crystals behind true gout.
Current medicine handles the aftermath, not the cause. Doctors use anti-inflammatory drugs, colchicine or corticosteroids to settle an attack in appropriate patients. These drugs ease pain and swelling. They do not remove the deposits, and they don't reliably stop new crystals from forming.
That gap is precisely what the new findings might eventually address.
What does ENPP1 actually do?
Here's the more concrete of the two genes. ENPP1 helps produce pyrophosphate — the very material that builds the crystals. A link between this gene and CPPD gives scientists a concrete starting point for investigating how cells control the amount of crystal-building material floating around a joint.
The findings can also guide researchers toward which parts of the joint to study next, such as the cartilage where deposits collect. In other words, the genetics point a finger at a mechanism. That's rare and useful.
RNF144B is murkier. Researchers are interested in whether it changes how cells respond to inflammation. If it does, it could help explain a puzzle clinicians know well: deposits that sit quiet at one point can be associated with an acutely painful joint at another. Same crystals, different outcome. The gene might be part of why.
What does this change for patients?
Right now, nothing. And it's worth being blunt about that.
A genetic association is several steps away from a medicine. Researchers still need to work out which variants actually change the behavior of the genes, what those changes do inside a joint, and whether a treatment could act on them without causing problems elsewhere in the body. Each step can fail.
The study also has limits its authors flag honestly. Most participants were male veterans, which means the findings need checking in women and in people whose health histories differ from the study population. It's also possible for someone to carry deposits without a clear diagnosis in their medical record, muddying the comparison groups.
What drug developers get from this
The research hands drug developers two distinct questions to work on:
- Whether crystal formation can be reduced safely — attacking the supply of crystal-building material, with ENPP1 as a candidate entry point.
- Whether the joint can be made less likely to flare in response to crystals already sitting there, a question where RNF144B and inflammation response may matter.
Both paths would need rigorous testing before any patient benefits. That's years, not months.
Still, this is how the slow mechanics of drug discovery start: not with a pill, but with a target. Two genes, one tied to the crystal-building material itself and one possibly tied to the inflammation that makes crystals hurt, now have evidence behind them from over half a million genomes.
For the millions who've felt a joint go hot and swollen overnight, that's not a treatment yet. It's a direction. Directions beat nothing.
Readers following joint-pain research may also want to look at our coverage of a common arthritis supplement linked to faster Alzheimer's development, and a mosquito virus that can cause years of joint pain.
via knowridge.com (Source)
More from James Calloway
Show full bio
Staff writer covering regulation, policy and their impact on general science news at SciBeat.
377 articles
Nearby plates
- Five chronic illnesses may share a common biological root, study finds
- Six patients, one clue to cancer's recurring arthritis
- High blood pressure accelerates osteoarthritis via hormone pathway
- Immune 'false alarm' may drive rapid aging, study finds
- Zero Recurrences in Three Years: Immunotherapy Reshapes Bowel Cancer Care