Plate Nº 15 · recorded November 4, 2026

Chemistry & MaterialsReported finding

Flexible molecular links create new nanoparticle crystals

MIT researchers used flexible, charged molecular connectors to control nanoparticle bonding and create previously unseen crystal lattices, offering a new route to designer materials.

By Priya Raman5 min read1,007 words

In brief

  1. MIT reported the discovery on November 4, 2026.
  2. Flexible ligands overturned 20 years of preference for rigid molecular connections.
  3. Particle size and polymer-chain length controlled the number of bonds per nanoparticle.
  4. The team created previously unseen, more open nanoparticle superlattices.
  5. The forthcoming Nature Materials paper carries DOI 10.1038/s41563-026-02787-0.
MIT scientists break a 20-year rule and unlock never-before-seen crystal structures
Plate Nº 15MIT scientists break a 20-year rule and unlock never-before-seen crystal structures — Myriams-Fotos / pixabay

On November 4, 2026, MIT researchers reported overturning a 20-year materials-science rule: extremely flexible molecular connectors can control how nanoparticles bond and yield crystal structures never observed before.

The result, described in a forthcoming paper in Nature Materials, reverses a longstanding assumption that rigid molecular links are needed to hold nanoparticles in planned arrangements. Allowing connectors to bend instead gave the team control over a different feature: the number of neighbors each particle could join.

Why does nanoparticle arrangement matter?

Materials scientists know that the arrangement of a material’s smallest components determines its behavior. If researchers understand both the components and their organization, they can explain a material’s properties and design new ones. Nanoparticles are extremely small pieces of matter whose shapes, sizes and other characteristics can be adjusted for particular uses, including drug delivery, energy storage, computing and sensors.

Experiments led by MIT PhD candidate Nicholas Sbalbi formed the core of the work. The team also included University of Delaware doctoral student Stephen Kronenberger, MIT undergraduate Hana Shinzawa, Matthew Ye, listed as PhD ’26, and Arthi Jayaraman, a former University of Delaware professor.

What did the MIT team reverse?

Robert J. Macfarlane, the Richard P. Simmons (1953) Professor in Metallurgy in MIT’s Department of Materials Science and Engineering, said: “Without having to predesign where the particles connect or what their shapes are, we can control the number of bonds each particle has.”

Researchers have traditionally tried to control nanoparticle assembly in two ways:

  • Reshaping nanoparticles so that specific forms fit together in selected arrangements.
  • Modifying selected regions of nanoparticle surfaces so that only those areas attract neighboring particles.

The second approach resembles designing puzzle pieces that connect only in particular positions. Both strategies can produce useful structures, but they demand complicated, highly specialized synthesis methods that can be difficult to adapt to large-scale production.

“Both of those approaches are difficult to do synthetically as we make the particles,” Macfarlane said. Existing methods for defining particle stickiness tend to work for one material, at one size scale and under one set of conditions rather than transferring easily to other systems.

Both strategies also depend on ligands, molecules that attach to nanoparticle surfaces and link neighboring particles. Researchers have generally made those ligands rigid to preserve predetermined connection angles. The MIT team instead used highly flexible ligands and allowed them to reorganize as the particles assembled.

How does flexibility control the bonds?

Macfarlane’s laboratory had spent years constructing nanoparticles with attached polymer chains. Polymers are large molecules made from repeating smaller units, and their flexibility makes them useful as adjustable molecular connectors.

For the new system, the researchers placed electrical charges at the ends of the flexible ligands. Some carried positive charges and others negative charges. Opposite charges attract, so the connectors bend toward suitable neighboring particles as the system assembles.

That reorganization influences the valency of each nanoparticle, meaning the number of neighboring particles it bonds to. The researchers did not have to specify the direction of every connection in advance. Instead, charge attraction brought compatible ligands together, while their flexibility determined how many connections could form and helped stabilize the resulting structure.

The degree of flexibility and the electrical charges therefore acted as design variables for nanoparticle assembly, rather than serving merely as imperfections to eliminate.

What crystal structures did the researchers create?

Crystals consist of components organized in repeating patterns. In this work, the repeating units were nanoparticles rather than individual atoms or small molecules. Researchers call these ordered nanoparticle networks superlattices.

Sbalbi’s experiments showed that researchers could adjust assembly through two relatively straightforward characteristics: nanoparticle size and the length of each flexible polymer chain. These changes altered the connections formed during assembly and, consequently, the number of neighboring particles linked to each nanoparticle.

By reducing the number of bonds, the team produced more open arrangements rather than the tightly packed structures that commonly form. Macfarlane said: “The amount of flexibility of the polymer dictates how many bonds it has. It allows us to lower the number of bonds each particle has and make lattices we have never seen before.”

What could designer materials accomplish?

A long-term goal in materials science is to select a nanoparticle for its electrical, optical or chemical characteristics and then place it in an arrangement suited to a specific application. That would give researchers independent control over the properties of the individual particle and the structure formed by many such particles.

Existing assembly techniques have not achieved that separation reliably. Macfarlane said the nanoparticle assembly community has aspired to independent control over particle type and final structure, but that ideal had not become reality.

The flexible-connector method may narrow that gap by creating a wider range of arrangements without the elaborate manufacturing steps required by conventional approaches. Potential uses include:

  • Photonics, or the control and manipulation of light: Ordered nanoparticles could help engineers produce materials with specialized optical properties.
  • Chemical catalysis, in which substances accelerate reactions: New particle arrangements could improve how catalysts operate.
  • Electronics, medicine, energy, agriculture and chemical manufacturing: More open formations could combine the individual capabilities of nanoparticles in useful ways.

The team also sees the approach as a possible route toward producing customizable materials at larger scales, which could help move nanoparticle technologies beyond laboratory experiments and into practical use.

What remains before practical use?

The work establishes an assembly strategy rather than a finished commercial technology. The researchers said further development will be necessary to translate the method into applications, and the source report did not establish performance in a specific device or manufacturing process.

The partial funders were the National Science Foundation, the Department of Energy, the U.S. Army and the U.S. Navy. The forthcoming paper, “Breaking symmetry in nanoparticle superlattices via spontaneous valency,” lists Sbalbi, Kronenberger, Shinzawa, Ye, Jayaraman and Macfarlane as its authors. Nature Materials lists the 2026 paper under DOI 10.1038/s41563-026-02787-0.

The work turns molecular bending from a manufacturing liability into a design variable.

via news.mit.edu (Original)

Filed under

  • nanoparticles
  • nanoparticle-superlattices
  • polymer-ligands
  • crystal-assembly
  • materials-science
Share this article:

More from Priya Raman

Priya Raman

Show full bio

Senior reporter covering people, launches and day-to-day practice in general science news at SciBeat.

288 articles

Nearby plates

« Previous article