Plate Nº 44 · recorded October 10, 2026

Space & AstronomyReported finding

New Method Tests Whether the Universe's Oldest Light Is Twisted

UC San Diego physicists built a new calibration framework that reproduces a 0.37 ± 0.12 degree rotation in the polarization of the cosmic microwave background, offering an independent way to separate cosmic signals from telescope errors.

By Marcus Bennett4 min read778 words

In brief

  1. The cosmic microwave background dates to roughly 380,000 years after the Big Bang and has traveled about 13.8 billion years.
  2. The UC San Diego method reproduced a cosmic-birefringence angle of 0.37 ± 0.12 degrees using eight Planck polarization maps.
  3. The paper was published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters in 2026, DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/aea401.
  4. E modes in CMB polarization were first detected in 2002; primordial B modes have not yet been observed.
  5. Brian Keating is principal investigator of the Simons Observatory, a next-generation CMB experiment in Chile.

A new calibration framework from UC San Diego reproduces a previously reported 0.37 ± 0.12 degree rotation in the polarization of the cosmic microwave background — the universe's oldest light, dating to roughly 380,000 years after the Big Bang.

The result, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, does not confirm the controversial rotation. It does, however, offer an independent way to check whether the tiny twist comes from the cosmos itself or from a small misalignment in telescope instruments.

What is cosmic birefringence?

The CMB is faint thermal radiation left over from when the universe cooled enough for light to travel freely. About 380,000 years after the Big Bang, radiation scattering off free electrons produced a small amount of linear polarization — light waves that oscillate in a preferred direction, much like sunlight glinting off Earth's atmosphere.

Several recent analyses have suggested this polarization may have rotated by a fraction of a degree during its roughly 13.8-billion-year journey. If real, the rotation could point to physics beyond the Standard Model, with possible ties to dark matter and dark energy.

Why detector calibration matters

The catch: a minuscule tilt in a telescope's polarization detectors would produce an almost identical signal. From the CMB alone, scientists cannot separate cosmic rotation from instrumental error, because both generate the same observed pattern.

"Before interpreting a tiny rotation as new physics, we want to know that the calibration itself can be trusted," said lead author Anto I. Lonappan, a postdoctoral fellow at UC San Diego.

The team — which also includes Chancellor's Distinguished Professor of Physics Brian Keating and associate professor Kam Arnold — built a new estimator that compares polarization maps made by different detector sets.

A genuine cosmic signal would appear in every map; an instrumental error would vary between detector groups. By subtracting one map from another, the method cancels any rotation common to all maps and leaves only the residual differences.

What the data show

The researchers applied their method to eight polarization maps from the European Space Agency's Planck satellite. They then compared their calibration pattern with an established technique called the Minami–Komatsu analysis, the current standard for separating instrumental rotation from cosmic birefringence.

The two approaches agreed, despite relying on different assumptions. As a conditional test, the team anchored their differential reconstruction to the common calibration mode inferred by the existing analysis. This reproduced a cosmic-birefringence angle of 0.37 ± 0.12 degrees — consistent with prior Minami–Komatsu findings.

What the method cannot do

The new technique is deliberately insensitive to any rotation common to all maps. It can therefore measure how well different detector sets are calibrated relative to each other, but it cannot by itself determine the absolute polarization angle.

Establishing the absolute cosmic-birefringence signal still requires an independent absolute calibration reference, and none yet exists for CMB data. In short, the framework distinguishes between detector sets but does not pin down the universe's twist on its own.

Why this matters for primordial B modes

The CMB carries two main types of polarization patterns, known as E modes and B modes. E modes, with symmetric patterns from density shifts in the early universe, were first detected in 2002. B modes have curl-like patterns.

Gravitational lensing — the bending of CMB light by intervening matter — already produces some B modes. But primordial gravitational waves from the inflationary epoch would generate an additional B-mode signal that no experiment has yet detected.

Finding those primordial B modes would deliver strong evidence for cosmic inflation, the rapid expansion thought to have occurred a fraction of a second after the Big Bang. It would also sharpen models of how the early universe evolved.

A small angle-calibration error can convert E modes into spurious B modes, mimicking the signal experiments hunt for. The new method could help future experiments rule out that contamination before claiming a discovery.

What comes next

Upcoming projects, including the Simons Observatory in Chile, where Keating is principal investigator, aim to push CMB polarization measurements well beyond Planck's sensitivity. As precision climbs, calibration checks will increasingly decide whether a faint signal counts as new physics or an instrument artifact.

"The detection of primordial B modes would transform our understanding of the early universe, so the measurement must survive rigorous calibration checks," Keating said. "Anto has developed a useful new framework for testing relative polarization-angle calibration. This is ultimately about knowing when we can trust a measurement."

Paper: Anto I. Lonappan et al, "Differential Polarization Calibration: A Consistency Test for Cosmic Birefringence," The Astrophysical Journal Letters (2026). DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/aea401.

via Phys.org Space & Astronomy (Source)

Filed under

  • cosmic-microwave-background
  • cosmic-birefringence
  • cosmic-inflation
  • polarization-calibration
  • planck-satellite
Share this article:

More from Marcus Bennett

Marcus Bennett

Show full bio

News editor covering marketplaces and e-commerce at SciBeat.

221 articles

Nearby plates

« Previous articleNext article »