Plate Nº 85 · recorded October 2, 2026
Health & Medicine ResearchReported finding
Newborn Heel-Prick Blood Samples May Help Measure Infection Protection
Aarhus University researchers show routine heel-prick samples can measure maternal antibodies against group B Streptococcus, a step toward vaccines protecting newborns from serious infection.
By Nathan Brooks3 min read682 words
In brief
- Heel-prick samples from Danish newborns can reliably measure maternally transferred antibodies against group B Streptococcus, matching standard blood sample results.
- The study is a small proof-of-concept, and the team is now expanding it with larger samples from different populations and countries.
- Identifying a protective antibody level could help assess the effectiveness of future GBS vaccines given to pregnant women.
A routine blood sample taken from a newborn's heel a few days after birth can do more than screen for rare congenital diseases. According to a new study from Aarhus University published in The Lancet Microbe, these same heel-prick samples can measure antibodies against group B Streptococcus — a bacterium that causes serious infections in newborns.
In the longer term, the method could support the development of vaccines designed to protect infants against those infections.
What the study found
In Denmark, every newborn has a small blood sample taken from their heel a few days after birth. The sample feeds the country's screening program for a wide range of rare congenital diseases. The new research shows it can serve an additional purpose: measuring how many antibodies against group B Streptococcus, or GBS, a baby received from its mother during pregnancy.
The researchers compared GBS antibody measurements from heel-prick samples and umbilical cord blood with measurements from a standard blood sample taken from the same newborn. Heel-prick measurements closely reflected the antibody levels found in standard blood samples. Umbilical cord blood also generally gave a good indication of the baby's antibody level.
Antibodies are proteins the immune system produces to fight specific threats. When a mother's immune system encounters GBS, it makes antibodies against it — and during pregnancy, those antibodies can pass from mother to baby before birth, potentially helping shield the newborn from infection.
"Heel-prick samples appear to be a practical and reliable way of measuring these antibodies," says May Murra, a postdoctoral researcher at the Department of Biomedicine at Aarhus University. "A major advantage is that the samples are already collected routinely, and the material is easier to collect, store and transport than standard blood samples."
Why it matters for vaccines
GBS can cause serious infections in newborns, which is why researchers are searching for better ways to protect infants. One leading approach is to vaccinate the mother during pregnancy so her immune system produces antibodies against the bacterium. Those antibodies then transfer to the baby before birth.
That strategy only works if scientists understand how effectively mothers pass antibodies on. "To improve our ability to protect newborns against serious GBS infections, we need to know how effectively mothers can transfer antibodies to their babies before birth," Murra explains. "We can now gain that knowledge, having shown that the heel-prick samples already collected from newborns can be used to measure antibody levels."
In the short term, the findings matter most to researchers and vaccine developers working on GBS vaccines for pregnant women. The Aarhus team has already begun investigating the relationship between the amount of GBS antibodies in a baby and the risk of developing an infection. Their goal is to determine what antibody level is needed to protect a newborn.
If researchers can identify an antibody level associated with protection, that threshold could potentially serve as a benchmark for assessing how well future vaccines work.
"In the longer term, we hope this knowledge can help pave the way for a vaccine for pregnant women that can protect newborns against serious GBS infections," says Murra. "First, however, we need to learn more about what level of antibodies actually protects the baby."
Important caveats
The study is a small proof-of-concept investigation. In other words, the researchers set out primarily to test whether the method works in principle, not to draw definitive conclusions about protection or vaccine effectiveness at a population level. The team is now working to expand the research using a larger set of blood samples drawn from different populations and countries.
Until those larger studies are complete, the results should be treated as a promising early step rather than a finished clinical tool.
Publication details
The study, titled "Assessment of dried blood spot and umbilical cord blood samples for the quantification of maternally transferred IgG against the group B streptococcal alpha-like surface proteins in neonates at Kolding Hospital, Denmark: a proof-of-concept, cross-sectional study," appears in The Lancet Microbe (2026), DOI: 10.1016/j.lanmic.2026.101409.
via Medical Xpress (Source)
More from Nathan Brooks
Nearby plates
- How Fetal DNA Travels in Maternal Blood May Fix Prenatal Test Errors
- No Clear Link Between Rotavirus Vaccination and Type 1 Diabetes
- Screening Children for Type 1 Diabetes Is Feasible, 8-Country Study Finds
- Three Timed Signals Turn Blood B Cells Into Antibody Factories
- Experimental Pill Trial Aims to Slow Congo's Deadliest Ebola Outbreak