Plate Nº 34 · recorded November 11, 2026

Chemistry & MaterialsReported finding

One 'Biodegradable' Plastic Hit 99.9% Breakdown in 17 Days. Another Stalled at 2.7% in 320

In landfill leachate tests, PHB hit 99.9% breakdown in 17 days while PBAT stalled at 2.7% over 320 days, KAIST and UNIST researchers report.

By Elena Vasquez4 min read709 words

In brief

  1. PHB reached 99.9% mineralization in 17 days; PBAT only 2.7% and LDPE 0.4% after 320 days in landfill leachate at 35 °C.
  2. PLA degraded to 83.6% mineralization after 320 days despite an initial ~20-day lag, surprising researchers at mesophilic anaerobic conditions.
  3. Of 238 reconstructed microbial genomes, 118 carried candidate plastic-degradation genes but only 49 showed active transcription.
  4. The study, led by KAIST Professor Jaewook Myung with UNIST, appeared in Nature Communications (2026), DOI 10.1038/s41467-026-78850-w.
Landfill leachate tests reveal divergent fates of biodegradable plastics
Plate Nº 34Landfill leachate tests reveal divergent fates of biodegradable plastics — Daniel Miksha / unsplash

One plastic reached 99.9% breakdown in 17 days. Another, carrying the same "biodegradable" label, managed just 2.7% in 320 days.

That gap comes from laboratory experiments led by the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), published in Nature Communications. A team led by Professor Jaewook Myung of KAIST's Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, working with Professor Changsoo Lee's group at Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), incubated three biodegradable plastics in landfill leachate — the liquid that percolates through waste, carrying dissolved substances and microorganisms — under oxygen-free, anaerobic conditions at 35 °C for up to 320 days.

The plastics tested were polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB), poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT). Conventional low-density polyethylene (LDPE) served as a control.

What did the numbers show?

The researchers measured mineralization — the share of plastic-derived carbon converted into gases such as methane and carbon dioxide. That measure matters. It separates true microbial conversion from mere fragmentation into smaller pieces.

The outcomes diverged sharply under identical conditions:

  • PHB: 99.9% mineralized within 17 days.
  • PLA: roughly 20 days of no activity, then gradual degradation to 83.6% after 320 days.
  • PBAT: only 2.7% after 320 days.
  • LDPE: 0.4% after 320 days.

The PLA result stands out. PLA usually degrades readily in high-temperature composting facilities, and researchers expected little activity at a modest 35 °C in a landfill-like setting. Instead, it broke down substantially over the long run. Electron microscopy showed biofilms — thin layers of microorganisms attached to surfaces — sitting along cracks and damaged areas of the PLA films.

Takeaway: under landfill-like conditions, the three "biodegradable" plastics behaved like three different materials.

Which microbes are actually doing the work?

The team then examined gene activity in the microbial communities on the plastics. They combined metagenomic analysis, which reads the DNA present, with metatranscriptomic analysis, which reads the RNA being produced — that is, which genes are actually switched on.

Of 238 reconstructed microbial genomes, 118 carried candidate genes encoding enzymes that might depolymerize PHB or PLA. But only 49 of those genomes showed evidence that those genes were being transcribed. Having the gene, in short, does not mean using it.

Many of the transcription-supported candidates belong to poorly characterized microbial lineages, beyond the known, experimentally validated plastic degraders in reference databases. That makes these lineages promising targets for finding new plastic-degrading microorganisms and enzymes.

The gene activity also concentrated in biofilms on the plastic surfaces rather than in the surrounding leachate. So researchers need to track not just which microbes are present, but what the ones attached to the plastic are actually doing.

Takeaway: the most interesting suspects are unfamiliar microbes living directly on the plastic.

How solid are the findings?

The caveats are real. Transcription of a candidate gene does not prove that the microorganism or enzyme actually degrades plastic; each candidate function needs validation in follow-up experiments. And the degradation figures came from laboratory incubations at a constant 35 °C, so they should not be read as predictions of real-world landfill rates, which depend on temperature, oxygen and local microbial communities.

The study's broader point survives those limits. Biodegradable plastics are often evaluated on material properties or labels alone, yet a plastic that vanishes in a hot composting plant can persist for a long time in a landfill — especially when separate collection systems fall short and these materials end up mixed with general municipal waste.

"Our findings show that biodegradability is not simply an inherent property of a plastic material, but also depends on the environmental conditions and microbial communities it encounters after disposal," Myung said.

"The substantial degradation of PLA under mesophilic anaerobic conditions was particularly surprising, highlighting the importance of understanding which microorganisms are active and what functions they perform," he added, expressing hope that the work will guide more environmentally relevant biodegradability assessments and the discovery of new plastic-degrading organisms.

The paper is Shinhyeong Choe et al., "Divergent anaerobic fates of biodegradable plastics in landfill leachate," Nature Communications (2026), DOI: 10.1038/s41467-026-78850-w.

Takeaway: a biodegradability label tells you what a plastic might do — the disposal environment decides what it actually does.

via phys.org/rss-feed/ (Source)

Filed under

  • biodegradable-plastics
  • plastic-degradation
  • landfill-leachate
  • polyhydroxybutyrate-phb
  • polylactic-acid-pla
Share this article:

More from Elena Vasquez

Elena Vasquez

Show full bio

Correspondent covering money, funding and market shifts around general science news at SciBeat.

384 articles

Nearby plates

« Previous articleNext article »