Plate Nº 15 · recorded October 10, 2026
Health & Medicine ResearchReported finding
Quitting Ozempic for Two Years Raises Heart Risk by 22%
Stopping GLP-1 drugs like Ozempic for two years raised heart attack, stroke and death risk by 22% in a study of 333,687 U.S. veterans with type 2 diabetes.
By Priya Raman4 min read729 words
In brief
- Two years off GLP-1 drugs was linked to a 22% higher risk of heart attack, stroke, and death (study of 333,687 U.S. veterans, BMJ Medicine, September 2026).
- Continuous three-year GLP-1 use cut major cardiovascular event risk by 18% compared with sulfonylureas.
- 26% of GLP-1 users in the study stopped the medication entirely; about 23% had a gap of at least six months.
- Even a six-month interruption raised cardiovascular risk by 4–8% compared with continuous use.
- Restarting the drug restored some, but not all, of the lost heart protection.
People with type 2 diabetes who stopped taking GLP-1 drugs such as Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro, and Zepbound for two years had a 22% higher risk of heart attack, stroke, and death than those who stayed on the medications, according to a study published September 21, 2026, in BMJ Medicine.
That increase largely wiped out the cardiovascular protection patients had built up while on the drugs. The finding comes from researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, who tracked 333,687 U.S. veterans with type 2 diabetes for up to three years.
GLP-1 medications — semaglutide, sold as Ozempic and Wegovy, and tirzepatide, sold as Mounjaro and Zepbound — help lower blood sugar and reduce weight. About one in eight U.S. adults now take them. They also protect the heart, but the new research suggests that protection fades surprisingly fast once treatment stops.
What did the study find?
The researchers, led by clinical epidemiologist Ziyad Al-Aly, compared GLP-1 users with veterans prescribed sulfonylureas, an older class of diabetes drugs that includes glipizide (Glucotrol), glimepiride (Amaryl), and glyburide (Diabeta). Of the participants, 132,551 had been prescribed GLP-1 drugs and 201,136 sulfonylureas.
The team reassessed each patient's treatment status every six months. During the study, 26% of GLP-1 users stopped the medication entirely, and roughly 23% had a gap of at least six months before restarting.
The results showed a clear pattern:
- Continuous GLP-1 use for three years cut the risk of major cardiovascular events by 18% compared with sulfonylureas — about four fewer events per 100 people over three years.
- Stopping after two or two-and-a-half years still yielded risk reductions of 7% and 15%, respectively.
- Stopping before 18 months produced no significant reduction in cardiovascular risk by the study's end.
- A temporary interruption before restarting cut the average benefit from 18% to 12%, with even a six-month gap raising risk by 4% to 8% compared with continuous use.
- One year off treatment raised risk by 14%; two years off raised it by 22%.
Why does stopping hurt the heart?
The study is observational, so it shows associations rather than proof of cause and effect. Still, the mechanism appears metabolic. When people quit the drugs, inflammation, blood pressure, and cholesterol rebound, even if weight regain is the only change patients notice.
"There is enormous exuberance about starting GLP-1 drugs, but not nearly enough attention to what happens when people stop," said Al-Aly, who also serves as chief of the Research and Development Service at the VA Saint Louis Health Care System. "Many quit after a few months because of cost, side effects or shortages. When they stop, it's not just weight that comes back; they experience a resurgence in inflammation, blood pressure, and cholesterol. Weight regain is visible; the metabolic reversal is not."
He described the effect as "metabolic whiplash" that is detrimental to heart health. Restarting the medication restored some protection, but only partially — which Al-Aly says shows that discontinuation leaves "a lasting scar."
What are the study's limits?
The study population consisted almost entirely of veterans, a group that skews older and male, so the findings may not apply to everyone. The data also cover people with type 2 diabetes, not those taking GLP-1 drugs solely for weight loss. And because the analysis is observational, other factors could partly explain the differences in outcomes.
The Department of Veterans Affairs funded the research but had no role in its design, analysis, or publication; the contents do not represent the views of the VA or the U.S. Government.
What should patients and doctors take from it?
The findings suggest patients and clinicians who want the heart benefits of GLP-1 therapy should treat uninterrupted use as the goal. Protection appears to accumulate gradually over years of continuous treatment but disappears much more quickly — one year off was enough to erase benefits that took years to build.
"Clinicians should treat adherence to GLP-1 treatment as an important outcome in its own right — not an afterthought," Al-Aly said. He called on health systems to manage side effects proactively, talk candidly with patients about the long-term nature of treatment, identify people at risk of stopping, and address the cost barriers that make GLP-1 therapy unsustainable for many.
via medicine.washu.edu (Original)
More from Priya Raman
Show full bio
Senior reporter covering industry trends and analytics at SciBeat.
207 articles
Nearby plates
- Stanford Medicine: 1 in 10 People May Resist GLP-1 Diabetes Drugs
- Cleveland Clinic Examines What Happens After GLP-1 Discontinuation
- GLP-1 Diabetes Drugs Show Real-World Benefits in Young People
- Semaglutide Linked to 21% Lower Psychiatric Hospitalization Risk
- GLP-1 Drugs Improve Bodies, But Life Outcomes Stay Unchanged