Plate Nº 86 · recorded October 10, 2026

Space & AstronomyReported finding

Rocky Planets May Have Formed Just 100 Million Years After Big Bang

New simulations from the University of Portsmouth suggest rocky, water-rich planets could have begun forming around low-mass stars just 100 million years after the Big Bang.

By Priya Raman3 min read676 words

In brief

  1. Rocky planet formation may have begun just 100 million years after the Big Bang, about 13.8 billion years earlier than scientists once expected.
  2. Pair-instability supernovae can eject more than 100 times the Sun's mass in heavy elements in a single blast.
  3. The simulated disk circled a star about 70 percent as massive as the Sun and held enough solid material for several Earth-masses of planetary building blocks at roughly Earth's orbital distance.
  4. The disk contained substantial amounts of water, only a few times less than what was present when our own Solar System formed.
  5. The paper was published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters on August 31, 2026.

Rocky planets could have started forming as early as 100 million years after the Big Bang, roughly 13.7 billion years earlier than scientists once assumed, new simulations from the University of Portsmouth suggest.

The work, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters on August 31, 2026, marks the first time researchers have modeled planet-formation chemistry around a low-mass star in the debris of the very first cosmic explosions.

Scientists have long placed the earliest possible rocky worlds billions of years into cosmic history. The Portsmouth team now argues that the necessary ingredients may have existed almost from the start.

What did the first stars leave behind?

The first generation of stars, known as Pop III stars, were far more massive than the Sun. When they exploded as supernovae, they scattered carbon, oxygen, iron and other heavy elements — the raw material of rocky planets — into surrounding gas clouds.

One especially violent variety, the pair-instability supernova, can eject more than 100 times the Sun's mass in heavy elements in a single blast. That kind of pollution, the simulations show, can seed nearby gas with enough planet-building matter to form a rotating disk around a young star.

These ancient stellar explosions acted as the Universe's first major sources of the heavier elements that eventually built planets and, in time, life.

How did the team build the model?

Dr. Daniel Whalen, of the University of Portsmouth's Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation, led the project. PhD student Chris Jessop ran the first stage of the simulation chain.

Their model followed the aftermath of one pair-instability supernova and tracked the chemistry of the gas it enriched. Gravity then pulled the metal-rich gas into a rotating disk around a young, low-mass star.

The setup resembles, in many ways, the disk of gas and dust that eventually produced our own Solar System — only this one began forming before the first galaxies had fully taken shape.

What did the disk contain?

The team found a disk circling a star about 70 percent as massive as the Sun. Inside that disk, enough solid material collected to build several Earth-masses of planetesimals — the small rocky bodies that collide and merge to form full-sized planets — at roughly Earth's orbital distance.

Whalen described the result directly: "Within that disc, enough solid material accumulated to create several Earth-masses' worth of planetary building blocks at roughly the same distance from the star as Earth is from the Sun."

The disk also held a substantial water reservoir, only a few times smaller than the supply that helped build Earth's oceans.

Could these planets have been habitable?

The water finding raises a sharper question. Whalen noted: "This means that any planets forming there could potentially have received water in a similar way to Earth, which is thought to have gained much of its water from material left over during the planet-building process."

The researchers stop short of claiming life existed that early. Their models show only that the raw ingredients and physical conditions appeared unusually soon in cosmic time.

Why does the early timing matter?

If rocky planets could indeed condense around low-mass stars just 100 million years after the Big Bang, the Universe may have been a planet-forming machine almost from the moment the first lights switched on.

"Our findings suggest that the conditions for planet formation may have existed much earlier than previously thought," Whalen said. The result, he added, raises an "intriguing question: could potentially habitable worlds have appeared far earlier in the Universe's history as well?"

To put this into perspective, the Universe today is about 13.8 billion years old, so a 100-million-year window sits less than 1 percent of the way through cosmic history.

Other researchers will need to extend the simulations, vary the supernova masses and check whether such disks survive long enough to actually form planets. The Portsmouth team frames the work as a starting point, not a confirmed history of the early cosmos.

via dx.doi.org (Original)

Filed under

  • planet-formation
  • early-universe
  • population-iii-stars
  • supernovae
  • cosmology
Share this article:

More from Priya Raman

Priya Raman

Show full bio

Senior reporter covering industry trends and analytics at SciBeat.

207 articles

Nearby plates

« Previous articleNext article »