Plate Nº 57 · recorded November 12, 2026

PhysicsReported finding

Tabletop Quantum Device Could Measure How Earth Twists Space-Time

A proposed superfluid helium sensor could match satellite-grade frame dragging measurements in 35 minutes — if physicists can build barriers just one nanometer wide.

By James Calloway4 min read875 words

In brief

  1. Study published Sept. 17 in Physical Review Letters proposes a tabletop superfluid helium-4 device to measure frame dragging.
  2. The device could theoretically reach 0.2% precision in ~35 minutes, matching LARES-2 satellite results that took ~3 years of laser tracking.
  3. Current designs use ~90-nanometer holes; millikelvin operation requires ~1-nanometer holes, not yet built into a working sensor.
  4. The target signal corresponds to a time difference of about 10^-35 seconds between helium flows around the loop.
  5. Below 0.7 K, the team's analysis shows thermal noise drops sharply as helium gets colder.
Physicists propose new quantum device to measure how Earth twists space-time
Plate Nº 57Physicists propose new quantum device to measure how Earth twists space-time — PublicDomainPictures / pixabay

A proposed tabletop quantum sensor could measure frame dragging — the subtle way Earth's spin twists the space-time around it — to 0.2% precision in about 35 minutes, according to a study published Sept. 17 in Physical Review Letters. That precision would match the best satellite result on record, which took roughly three years of laser tracking to achieve.

There's a catch, and it's about one nanometer wide. But let's start with what the physicists actually claim.

What is frame dragging?

Einstein's general relativity predicts that a massive, spinning object drags the fabric of space-time along with it, much like a spoon twirling in honey. Around supermassive objects, such as the Milky Way's central black hole, the effect is obvious. Around Earth, it is very faint.

So far, scientists have only measured it from orbit. They tracked how twisting space-time slowly shifts spinning gyroscopes or satellite paths. NASA's Gravity Probe B, carrying four gyroscopes, confirmed the prediction in 2011 with a margin of error of about 18%. Laser-tracked satellites have since improved on that. In July, researchers reported in Nature that the LARES-2 satellite had shrunk the margin to 0.2%.

That 0.2% came at a cost. It required about three years of laser tracking, and researchers had to subtract the stronger tugs caused by Earth's equatorial bulge and unevenly spread mass. To do that, they leaned on detailed gravity maps made by other satellites. A lab-based measurement would be free of those modeling assumptions.

Why bother? Precision here is a stress test. Several alternative theories of gravity predict a slightly different amount of twisting than general relativity does.

How does the quantum loop work?

The paper addresses a classic mismatch in physics. Picture a ring of clocks bolted to a spinning merry-go-round. You synchronize each clock with its neighbor, then compare the last clock with the first. They don't match.

"It is impossible to synchronize that collection of clocks when you're in a rotating frame," Kai-Isaak Ellers, a physics graduate student at UC Berkeley and first author of the study, told Live Science.

The new device is a loop of superfluid helium-4 — helium chilled until it flows without friction and behaves as one giant quantum object. A thin barrier riddled with tiny holes, called a Josephson junction, interrupts the loop. Superfluid helium slips through those holes; ordinary liquid helium cannot.

"That's where the quantum behavior comes from," said co-author K. Birgitta Whaley, a quantum physicist at UC Berkeley.

As Earth spins and drags space-time, it nudges the quantum state of the helium passing through the junction. That nudge shifts the frequency at which the helium sloshes back and forth in the loop, and that shift is what the researchers could detect.

What stands between proposal and measurement?

Superfluid devices, many built at UC Berkeley, have detected Earth's rotation since the late 1990s. But helium-4 versions built around a Josephson junction have only worked within about a hundredth of a degree of 2.17 K (minus 455.76 F, or minus 270.98 C), the temperature where helium-4 becomes superfluid. At that temperature, leftover "normal" helium mixed into the superfluid adds noise.

The team instead calculated how the device would behave a few thousandths of a degree above absolute zero. Below 0.7 K, the noise changes character and then drops sharply as the helium gets colder. That thermal noise analysis, showing how sensitive these devices could be at millikelvin temperatures, is the paper's key finding.

"This seems to be a very serendipitous discovery that at millikelvin, we can get this high sensitivity," Whaley told Live Science.

Now the catch. Earlier helium-4 devices used holes about 90 nanometers wide. Millikelvin operation demands holes roughly 1 nanometer across — about the size of a helium atom. Co-author Keith Schwab, a Caltech physicist, and his collaborators are developing such materials. They have not yet been built into a working sensor.

If they can be, the researchers calculate the device could hit 0.2% precision in about 35 minutes. With a vibrating membrane made from the lowest-loss crystals, such as quartz or sapphire, that could drop to about one second.

What does this change for physics?

Right now, nothing measurable. The paper is a theoretical proposal plus a noise analysis, not an experimental result. The signal itself corresponds to a time difference of about 10⁻³⁵ seconds between helium flowing one way around the loop and the other — the same mismatch as the merry-go-round clocks.

"The interesting thing about it is just how small it is," Whaley said. "It's not so far off from the Planck time" — about 10⁻⁴⁴ seconds, the shortest slice of time before known physics is expected to break down.

This experiment remains a billion times too large to reach that limit, Whaley noted. Still, future helium experiments could probe whether time flows smoothly, like a ramp, or ticks forward in indivisible jumps, like the frames of a movie.

Until someone builds a working 1-nanometer barrier, the promise stays on paper. The idea is elegant. The hardware isn't here yet.

via livescience.com/feeds/news (Source)

Filed under

  • quantum-sensing
  • frame-dragging
  • general-relativity
  • superfluid-helium
  • gravity
Share this article:

More from James Calloway

James Calloway

Show full bio

Staff writer covering regulation, policy and their impact on general science news at SciBeat.

346 articles

Nearby plates

« Previous articleNext article »