Plate Nº 57 · recorded September 29, 2026
Health & Medicine ResearchReported finding
Two-Year Trial Finds Diet Drinks Match Water for Weight Management
The 104-week SWITCH trial found diet drinks with aspartame, acesulfame-K and sucralose equal to water for weight loss, with no harm to appetite or metabolism.
By Marcus Bennett3 min read661 words
In brief
- The 104-week SWITCH trial of 493 adults found diet beverages equivalent to water for weight loss: −4.8 kg vs −3.7 kg, a non-significant difference.
- No clinically meaningful differences in blood pressure, cholesterol or appetite regulation appeared after two years of consuming aspartame, acesulfame-K or sucralose.
- The results challenge WHO guidance against non-sugar sweeteners, which relied on observational studies rather than randomized trials.

After two years, people who drank diet beverages daily lost just as much weight as people who drank water. That is the central result of the longest and most comprehensive randomized controlled trial of non-nutritive sweetened soft drinks to date, conducted by researchers at the University of Liverpool and published in the British Journal of Nutrition.
Non-nutritive sweeteners are low- or no-calorie alternatives to sugar used to sweeten foods and drinks. The trial, known as SWITCH, followed 493 adults with overweight or obesity through a structured behavioral weight management program. Researchers randomly assigned participants to consume either water or commercially available diet beverages every day, with sweetener levels well within European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) safety thresholds.
The drinks in the trial contained aspartame, acesulfame potassium (acesulfame-K) or sucralose — three of the most widely used sugar substitutes on the market.
What the numbers show
At 104 weeks, the diet beverage group had lost an average of 4.8 kg (10.6 pounds), while the water group had lost 3.7 kg (8.2 pounds). That difference was not statistically significant, meaning the two options performed equivalently. Both groups kept the weight off over the full two years, even during the final year when participants received no structured assistance.
The benefits went beyond the scale. Participants in both groups showed decreases in waist and hip circumference, improvements in body composition, and better readings on several metabolic biomarkers. Long-term consumption of the sweetened drinks produced no clinically meaningful differences in blood pressure or cholesterol compared with water. Sugar intake fell in both groups, with slightly larger reductions among the diet beverage drinkers.
The results also undercut a persistent worry: that sweeteners disrupt appetite regulation or cause long-term metabolic harm. Tested rigorously over two years, those concerns did not materialize.
Why this matters for global guidance
The findings speak directly to recent World Health Organization guidance. The WHO advised against using non-sugar sweeteners for weight control, citing uncertainty in observational studies — research that tracks people's habits without controlling them. Observational studies can miss confounding factors; randomized controlled trials like SWITCH, which assign interventions by chance, carry stronger evidentiary weight.
Jo Harrold, dean of psychology at the University of Liverpool and lead researcher on the study, framed the results in that policy context. "These latest findings show that concerns about sweeteners disrupting appetite or causing weight gain are not supported when tested in a rigorous, long-term randomized trial," she said. "We hope this evidence informs future WHO guidance and public health policy."
Jason Halford, a professor of biological psychology and health behaviors at the University of Leeds who previously worked at the University of Liverpool, co-led the research. "This study provides the long-term clinical evidence that has been missing from international discussions," he said. "For people trying to manage their weight, non-nutritive sweetened beverages offer an effective alternative to sugar-sweetened drinks — and perform equivalently to water over two years."
The trial's full name reflects its design: the effectS of non-nutritive sWeetened beverages on appetITe during aCtive weigHt loss. The researchers conceived it to reduce sugar in the diet and to answer open questions about how sweeteners affect appetite when they replace sugar. The current work builds on earlier evidence the team published in the International Journal of Obesity in 2023.
Caveats to keep in mind
The American Beverage Association funded the study. The researchers say they operated independently of the funder and retained full control over the analysis and reporting of the findings. The trial also focused on adults with overweight or obesity in a structured weight management program, so the results may not translate directly to other populations or to everyday use outside such a program.
Still, for the millions of people weighing whether to reach for a diet soda or a glass of water, the evidence now says: over two years, either choice supports weight management equally well.
via Medical Xpress (Source)
More from Marcus Bennett
Nearby plates
- Amylin Drug Petrelintide Delivers Over 10% Weight Loss
- Very Low Carb Diets Show Health Benefits in Children with Type 1 Diabetes
- Diet and Exercise Reverse Early-Onset Type 2 Diabetes in Half of Cases
- Triple-Action Drug Retatrutide Delivers Major Weight Loss in Type 2 Diabetes
- Muscle-Sparing Antibody Halves Lean Mass Loss from Semaglutide