Plate Nº 65 · recorded November 9, 2026
Space & AstronomyReported finding
Artemis II caused the largest measured ionospheric disturbance
A Taiwan team reports that Artemis II's April 2026 launch created two continent-scale ionospheric holes, with changes equivalent to temporary GPS errors of several meters.
By Priya Raman4 min read776 words
In brief
- The April 2026 Artemis II launch produced the largest rocket-linked ionospheric disturbance measured to date.
- Its effect reached up to 10 times the intensity observed after SpaceX Starship test launches.
- Two ionospheric holes each stretched about 3,100 miles (5,000 kilometers) across the American continent.
- Upper-stage burns at roughly 115 miles (185 kilometers) caused the strongest effect, equivalent to several meters of GPS positioning error.
- The study appeared as an online pre-print in Geophysical Research Letters, leaving its findings preliminary.
By Priya Raman
April 2026's NASA Artemis II launch produced the largest ionospheric disturbance yet measured from a rocket, and ground-based Global Positioning System (GPS) data indicated changes equivalent to positioning errors of several meters.
A team at National Cheng Kung University (NCKU) in Taiwan reported the result in an online pre-print in Geophysical Research Letters, a paper posted before a final journal version. The authors found that no earlier rocket launch had produced a larger disturbance. Their measurements showed an effect up to 10 times as intense as disturbances following test launches of SpaceX's Starship.
Because the paper is a pre-print, its findings should be treated as preliminary.
Artemis II used the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket. Starship, however, has twice SLS's liftoff thrust. The tenfold comparison therefore describes the measured atmospheric disturbance, not relative engine capability.
What did the GPS network measure?
Researchers analyzed data from high-precision networks of fixed, ground-based GPS receivers. U.S. scientific institutions use those stations to measure minute movements of Earth's tectonic plates, the large rock plates forming the surface, in the lead-up to earthquakes.
By timing how long GPS signals took to travel from space, the team reconstructed how the mission changed free-electron concentrations in the ionosphere, the electrically charged layer above 30 miles (50 kilometers). Free electrons are charged particles within that layer.
Those density changes were equivalent to positioning errors of several meters. The study described the GPS effect as temporary and localized.
Where did the atmospheric holes form?
After the launch, researchers observed two temporary holes. One followed the 212-foot-long (65-meter) SLS core stage, the rocket's main lower section; the other followed two subsequent thruster burns of the upper stage, the section that continued carrying Orion upward. Each hole stretched east to west across the American continent for about 3,100 miles (5,000 kilometers), resembling giant contrails.
Despite the core stage's enormous power, the disturbance from the second-stage burns was far more prominent. Those burns occurred directly inside the ionosphere, at altitudes around 115 miles (185 kilometers), more than an hour after liftoff.
The burns allowed NASA's Orion capsule to break free from Earth's gravity and head for the moon.
How can a rocket disturb navigation signals?
When a rocket climbs through high-altitude air at supersonic speed, meaning faster than sound, its body creates a shock wave that virtually punches a hole in the ionosphere. The disturbance temporarily changes the concentration of free electrons there.
That change alters radio-signal propagation. A signal can reach Earth faster or more slowly, which makes GPS receivers calculate inaccurate distances and positions.
At any single moment, a receiver determines its location by measuring distances to four different GPS satellites. GPS satellites and those of other global navigation satellite systems orbit around 12,550 miles (20,200 kilometers) above Earth, well above the ionosphere. Their positioning, navigation and timing signals must pass through the charged layer.
Severe solar storms can disrupt GPS for days by releasing energy into the atmosphere as charged particles from the sun. The rocket-induced effect is much more short-lived.
What could the errors mean for vehicles?
Charles Lin, an earth science professor at NCKU and a co-author of the paper, told Space.com: “A positioning error of a couple of meters is enough to cause an autonomous car to change lanes. It could have a strong impact not only on self-driving cars but also on drone positioning.”
The report says errors of several meters could send self-driving cars off track and potentially cause traffic collisions. It offered no documented examples of such accidents, framing them instead as possible consequences of temporary, localized navigation shifts.
Lin described such launch-driven interference as space weather, meaning changes in the upper atmosphere that can affect radio signals.
What does this mean for future missions?
Artemis II returned humans to lunar space for the first time in more than 50 years. NASA hopes the mission will pave the way for lunar landings and an eventual sustained human presence on the moon.
Lin also said: “Rocket launches from the ground to space produce that kind of effect, but we have never seen this kind of orbital maneuver in an interplanetary mission. In the future, as we are going to see many more missions going to the moon and to Mars, these space weather effects will become much more significant.”
The clearest conclusion is narrower: Artemis II left measurable, continent-scale ionospheric signatures, while the risks to cars and drones remain plausible rather than demonstrated.
via space.com (Source)
More from Priya Raman
Show full bio
Senior reporter covering people, launches and day-to-day practice in general science news at SciBeat.
342 articles
Nearby plates
- Starship reaches Earth orbit for the first time — with 26 satellites and an engine failure
- Moon-bound satellites could steady GPS when ground stations fail
- NASA's Roman Telescope launches on mission 1,000 times faster than Hubble
- NASA's Viking 2 Likely Caught Real Marsquakes in 1976, Study Finds
- NASA Targets 2028 Moon Landing With Overhauled Artemis Plan