Plate Nº 38 · recorded October 16, 2026

Space & AstronomyReported finding

Black Holes of All Sizes Fire Jets at the Same 2% Threshold

Black holes millions of times the Sun's mass launch delayed jets when feeding falls to 2% of the Eddington limit — the same rule known for small black holes, per Nature Astronomy.

By Marcus Bennett4 min read875 words

In brief

  1. Delayed jets switch on when a black hole's feeding rate drops to about 2% of its Eddington limit, regardless of mass.
  2. The study, published in Nature Astronomy on October 16, 2026, analyzed 20 tidal disruption events and used 10 with reliable data.
  3. Dr. Adelle Goodwin (Curtin University/ICRAR) led the work with co-author Dr. Andrew Mummery (Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton).
  4. Australia has invested $387 million in the Square Kilometre Array, whose total cost exceeds $2 billion.
  5. The insight emerged from a conversation at a conference in Madrid between the two researchers.
Astronomers discover a strange universal rule behind black hole eruptions
Plate Nº 38Astronomers discover a strange universal rule behind black hole eruptions — JillWellington / pixabay

By Marcus Bennett

Black holes that differ in mass by a factor of millions switch on their delayed jets at the same point: when their feeding rate falls to roughly 2% of a theoretical maximum called the Eddington limit. That is the central finding of a study published in Nature Astronomy on October 16, 2026, led by Dr. Adelle Goodwin of Curtin University's International Centre of Radio Astronomy Research (ICRAR), with co-author Dr. Andrew Mummery of the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton.

The result matters because it links two regimes astronomers usually study separately. Stellar-mass black holes weighing about 10 times the Sun were already known to launch jets near this 2% threshold. The new work shows supermassive black holes — millions of solar masses — obey the same rule.

"These black holes are separated by enormous differences in mass, but they appear to switch on their jets at the same point in the feeding process," Dr. Goodwin said. "That tells us something fundamental about black holes: the physics does not seem to care how big they are."

Why do some black holes erupt years after eating a star?

The team studied tidal disruption events — episodes in which a star passes too close to a supermassive black hole and gravitational forces tear it apart. Some of the debris spirals toward the black hole and temporarily boosts its feeding activity. Unlike the thousand-year cycles typical of supermassive black holes, these events unfold over a few years, so researchers can track a full feeding cycle.

Astronomers had a puzzle on their hands. Some black holes produce a radio jet almost immediately after shredding a star. Others stay quiet for months or even years before suddenly launching a detectable outflow.

"We were looking at these events and asking why the timing was so different," Dr. Goodwin said. "Then the pattern became clear. The delayed jets were appearing when the black hole's feeding rate dropped to the same critical point already known from much smaller black holes."

For practitioners, the takeaway is simple: delayed jets are not random; they track a measurable feeding threshold.

How did the researchers reach the 2% figure?

The team initially examined 20 tidal disruption events, combining observations from telescopes in Australia, the United States, India, South Africa, and space, across visible light, ultraviolet, X-ray, and radio wavelengths. They then narrowed the sample to 10 events with data solid enough to estimate both the matter-consumption rate and the timing of radio outflows.

The comparison revealed two distinct jet-producing stages:

  • An early stage, while the black hole consumes matter at an exceptionally high rate.
  • A delayed stage, hundreds or even thousands of days after the star's destruction, when the feeding rate falls to about 2% of the Eddington limit.

The Eddington limit is the point at which outward radiation pressure balances inward gravity; astronomers use it as a benchmark for how intensely a black hole is feeding. The same 2% threshold already appears in jet formation by small black holes inside the Milky Way, which is what makes the supermassive match striking.

Notably, the key insight did not arrive at a telescope. Goodwin and Mummery recognized the pattern during a conversation at a bar in Madrid, while attending a scientific conference.

What changes for radio astronomy?

Observing time on major radio facilities is limited and competitive. If astronomers can estimate when a feeding black hole will approach the 2% threshold, they can schedule observations around likely jet launches.

"Radio telescopes are incredibly powerful, but knowing when to look is just as important as knowing where to look," Dr. Goodwin said. "If we can anticipate when a black hole is more likely to launch a jet, we can run better targeted campaigns, waste fewer observations and improve our chances of catching these rare events at the moment they matter most."

The stakes are concrete for Western Australia, which will host the low-frequency component of the Square Kilometre Array Observatory (SKA). The Australian Government has invested $387 million in the SKA; the project's total cost exceeds $2 billion. Efficient targeting could squeeze more discovery out of that infrastructure. As new surveys identify growing numbers of tidal disruption events, the feeding-rate rule gives researchers a filter for deciding which ones deserve follow-up.

How solid is the result?

The finding rests on 10 well-characterized events out of an initial pool of 20 — a small sample drawn from rare phenomena. The researchers describe a consistent pattern, not a tested forecasting tool, and the paper's claim is that the threshold "appears" universal across masses. Expect the rule to face stricter tests as surveys deliver more events.

The broader significance, though, is already clear: the same basic physics seems to govern black holes across vastly different scales.

Professor James Arvanitakis, Director of the Forrest Research Foundation, which funded Goodwin's fellowship, framed the result as an argument for open-ended research. "The Forrest Research Foundation did not fund a predetermined answer, we backed an exceptional researcher with a difficult question," he said. "That question has led to a discovery of international significance."

One rule, two very different black holes, and a better clock for the universe's loudest burps.

via dx.doi.org (Original)

Filed under

  • black-holes
  • astrophysical-jets
  • tidal-disruption-events
  • eddington-limit
  • radio-astronomy
Share this article:

More from Marcus Bennett

Marcus Bennett

Show full bio

News editor covering regulation, policy and their impact on general science news at SciBeat.

257 articles

Nearby plates

« Previous articleNext article »