Plate Nº 63 · recorded October 13, 2026
Biology & EvolutionReported finding
DNA 'Typewriter' Traces Mouse Embryo's First 13.5 Days
A DNA 'typewriter' recorded 13.5 days of mouse embryonic development in unprecedented detail, letting researchers trace nearly every cell back to the moment the egg first split in two.
By Nathan Brooks3 min read525 words
In brief
- Study published October 8, 2026 in Science (DOI: 10.1126/science.ael0508); covers the first 13.5 days of a 19-to-21-day mouse gestation.
- Researchers started with 100 fertilized mouse eggs; only 10 embryos survived for analysis, with Embryo No. 3 yielding the cleanest lineage record.
- Senior authors are Jay Shendure of the University of Washington and Chengxiang Qiu of Dartmouth College.
- The DNA Typewriter writes cell-division history in order without cutting DNA, preserving a longer, higher-resolution record than older lineage tools.
- Recordings from Embryo No. 3 showed blood and retinal cells committing early, while outer skin cells waited noticeably later.

Scientists traced a mouse embryo's first 13.5 days of development, mapping nearly every cell back to the moment a fertilized egg split in two. The study, published October 8, 2026 in Science, used a DNA "typewriter" — a recording system that logs cell divisions directly into a genome.
Researchers started with 100 fertilized mouse eggs. Only ten embryos survived analysis. Embryo No. 3 gave them the cleanest record.
How does the "DNA Typewriter" work?
The technology came from Jay Shendure, a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator at the University of Washington, and Junhong Choi, now at Memorial Sloan Kettering.
It works like a typewriter. Instead of paper, it strikes a cell's own DNA.
"Every time a cell divides, it strikes one new character onto the next blank line — always in order, never overwriting what's already there," said Haedong Kim, a co-first author and postdoctoral scientist at UW Medicine. "Because the characters are always filled in sequence, that sequence itself spells out the cell's division history."
What's different from older methods?
Earlier lineage tools cut DNA to make marks, damaging cells and erasing earlier recordings. The typewriter writes without severing the DNA, keeping a longer, higher-resolution log.
Writing is only half the problem, Kim noted. You also have to read it back out of each cell, so the team redesigned its recording "tape" to make recovery easier.
What did 13.5 days of recording reveal?
Embryo No. 3's recording captured a permanent mark distinguishing the first two cells. Researchers traced nearly every profiled cell back to one founder or the other.
"One of these two founding cells did go on to produce more descendants than the other," Kim said, "but they produced diverse cell types at almost equal ratios."
That finding complicates the older idea that the first two cells of a mammalian embryo contribute asymmetrically to the body's tissues.
When do cells pick their final identities?
The recordings showed specialization happens on staggered timelines, not all at once:
- Blood and retinal cells committed relatively early.
- Outer skin cells waited noticeably longer.
- Many tissues stayed flexible well into organ formation.
Different cell types settled into identity on their own separate schedules — some early, some late.
Why does this matter for cancer and birth defects?
Shendure led the study with Chengxiang Qiu of Dartmouth College. Both serve as senior authors.
"We are interested in tracking how cells' early ancestry in an embryo influences their later fates," Shendure said. "Such research could eventually advance knowledge about congenital malformations, neurodevelopmental conditions, genetic disorders or cancer."
Co-first authors Qi Yu and Sophie Seidel, both at UW's Department of Genome Sciences, round out the team.
What's the catch?
Researchers worked entirely in mice. Mouse gestation runs 19 to 21 days, so the 13.5-day window covers roughly two-thirds of development and stops just short of birth.
Only one embryo yielded a near-complete record — a sign of how technically demanding the recordings still are.
The team says the approach offers something earlier tools couldn't: a single animal's complete developmental biography, written in its own DNA.
via dx.doi.org (Original)
More from Nathan Brooks
Show full bio
Market editor covering companies, deals and strategy in general science news at SciBeat.
219 articles
Nearby plates
- MIT team builds method that lets living cells mail out their own RNA
- Scientists Build the First Million-Cell Family Tree of a Developing Mouse
- Blood Cells From an 80-Year-Old Rejuvenated to Under 20 in the Lab
- No Lab-Grown Embryo Model Fully Matches the Real Thing, Study Finds
- New 'Computational Microscope' Simulates DNA Packaging at 10x Previous Scale