Plate Nº 21 · recorded November 13, 2026

Biology & EvolutionReported finding

Overlooked RNAs Act as Timing Switches for Genes in Embryos

Columbia researchers show enhancer RNAs control the timing of HOX gene activation in fruit fly embryos, with possible relevance to human disease.

By Marcus Bennett4 min read784 words

In brief

  1. The study was published in Science (2026), DOI 10.1126/science.aek5696.
  2. Genes make up only 2% of the human genome; the rest is the 'dark genome'.
  3. Enhancer RNAs were discovered roughly a decade ago.
  4. Blocking one enhancer RNA turned a HOX gene on at the wrong time, altering embryo morphology.
  5. The work was done in fruit fly embryos, which share many biological processes with humans.
Noncoding RNAs keep genes on time
Plate Nº 21Noncoding RNAs keep genes on time — Kost9n4 / pixabay

By Marcus Bennett

Genes make up just 2% of the human genome — and a new study published in Science shows that some of the remaining "dark genome" produces RNAs that act as molecular clock-keepers, controlling when crucial developmental genes switch on.

The research, led by Philippe Batut, assistant professor of genetics and development at Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, focused on fruit fly embryos. It found that mysterious RNA molecules produced by gene-regulating DNA sequences determine the timing of gene activation — not the on/off decision itself. Because similar RNAs appear across the animal kingdom, including in humans, the findings could eventually inform work on diseases driven by mistimed gene activity, from developmental defects to cancer.

Why timing matters in an embryo

Building a multicellular organism, even a fruit fly, resembles assembling complicated flat-pack furniture: the order of steps matters as much as the parts. "There are many moving parts, many cell types, many organs, and the sequence and timing of events really matter," Batut says. "Genes have to be turned on at the right time and the right place, or you're not going to get anywhere."

For practitioners in developmental biology and genetics, the study addresses a question that has lingered since the human genome was first sequenced more than two decades ago: what does the non-gene portion of our DNA actually do?

What are enhancer RNAs?

Enhancers are well-characterized DNA sequences that work like dimmer switches, raising or lowering the activity of genes. About a decade ago, researchers discovered that enhancers also give rise to strange noncoding RNAs — molecules that don't code for proteins.

Nobody knew whether these enhancer RNAs did anything meaningful during animal development or were merely biological noise. As a postdoctoral fellow at Princeton, and later in his own lab, Batut decided to test the question directly.

He developed real-time visualization techniques to watch endogenous noncoding RNAs and genes at work inside developing fruit fly embryos, which share many biological processes with humans. In plain terms: he built a live feed of gene activity in a growing embryo.

The first results showed that a large set of enhancer RNAs appeared at precise locations and precise times in the embryo — and seemed to coordinate the activation of HOX genes, a family of developmental regulators that pattern the body plan.

What did the experiments show?

The team then used genome editing to block one HOX gene's enhancer from producing its noncoding RNA. They expected the gene to switch off, or at least fade.

Instead, the opposite of a shutdown happened: the HOX gene turned on in the right place but at the wrong time, producing visible changes in the embryo's morphology.

"This showed us that these noncoding RNAs are not controlling whether the gene is switched on, but rather when it is switched on," Batut says.

Follow-up experiments revealed that activating these genes depends on a carefully coordinated "launch sequence," triggered by the enhancer RNA.

How do the RNAs work?

Enhancers can sit very far from the genes they regulate — sometimes thousands or millions of DNA bases away on a chromosome. DNA folding often bridges that distance, bringing enhancer and gene into physical contact.

"One aspect of how these noncoding RNAs work is that they seem to regulate the formation of these long-range DNA loops, which then controls the timing of gene expression," Batut explains.

At Columbia, his lab is now probing exactly how enhancer RNAs coordinate gene activity. "It's not just structural proximity between enhancers and genes; they are probably doing other interesting things as well, and those are questions we're trying to disentangle," he says.

What are the limitations and open questions?

The findings come from fruit flies, not humans, so any medical relevance remains preliminary. But similar enhancer RNAs occur widely in animals, including humans, and genetic dysregulation is already known to drive numerous human diseases. Noncoding RNA likely participates in many of those pathogenic processes.

"Their role in controlling timing is probably far more widespread than a couple of exotic genes," Batut says.

Because many mutations disrupt when and where genes are active, the work may point toward new therapeutic strategies — though that translation lies well ahead.

"That's why basic research is so wonderful; not only is it intellectually fascinating, but it also helps us understand how things break down and potentially how to fix them," Batut says.

Publication: Philippe J. Batut et al., Noncoding transcription controls the developmental dynamics of long-range gene regulation, Science (2026). DOI: 10.1126/science.aek5696.

In short: a once-ignored class of RNA tells developing genes not whether to fire, but when.

via phys.org/rss-feed/ (Source)

Filed under

  • noncoding-rna
  • gene-regulation
  • developmental-biology
  • enhancers
  • fruit-fly-embryos
Share this article:

More from Marcus Bennett

Marcus Bennett

Show full bio

News editor covering regulation, policy and their impact on general science news at SciBeat.

393 articles

Nearby plates

« Previous articleNext article »