Plate Nº 10 · recorded November 11, 2026
Science Policy & FundingReported finding
63% of Remote First Nations Homes Lack Working Free-to-Air TV
A 2026 survey of remote First Nations communities found 63% without working free-to-air TV, pushing households toward streaming — at an average $345 a month.
By Nathan Brooks4 min read887 words
In brief
- 63% of surveyed remote First Nations households had no working free-to-air TV in 2026
- Starlink uptake jumped from 4% in 2025 to 24% in 2026
- Households spend an average of $345 a month on mobile and internet services
- 83% of respondents cut back on essentials to afford internet access
- 23 remote communities got new Wi-Fi networks since 2024, with 53 more expected within two years

Almost two in three households surveyed in Australia's remote First Nations communities — 63% — had no working free-to-air television at home. That's the headline finding of the 2026 "Mapping the Digital Gap" report from RMIT University and Swinburne University of Technology, and it's quietly reshaping how families spend money on the internet.
The study covered remote and very remote communities that rely on the government-funded Viewer Access Satellite Television service, known as VAST. In plain terms, VAST beams TV directly to a satellite dish at each home, and that design shift is at the root of the problem.
Why did free-to-air TV stop working?
Researchers point to the switch from local broadcast towers to direct-to-home satellite. Once that happened, each household became responsible for its own equipment — with no coordinated maintenance or technical support behind it.
The failure points are mundane but expensive:
- Set-top boxes, the receivers that decode the satellite signal, can be wrecked by power surges and cost a lot to replace.
- Smart cards, which authorize the service, often hit activation problems.
- Getting a technician out from a regional centre can cost more than the equipment itself.
So the TV goes dark, and people turn to the one screen that still works: the phone.
What does broken TV do to internet use?
Associate Professor Daniel Featherstone of RMIT, a co-investigator on the project, said the shift toward streaming is changing household data consumption in remote communities.
"People were already using the internet for banking, government services and staying connected, but now they're also using significant amounts of data to stream digital media and television content," Featherstone said. "That adds to household costs and puts further pressure on mobile networks in remote communities."
In other words, a broken TV doesn't just mean missing the news — it means gigabytes of streamed content flowing through prepaid mobile plans.
Is Wi-Fi filling the gap?
Partly, yes. Community Wi-Fi is reducing reliance on prepaid mobile data, with 64% of respondents saying they used a public Wi-Fi service in the previous six months, up from 47% in 2025.
Twenty-three remote communities have received new Wi-Fi networks since 2024, and another 53 are expected to come online over the next two years.
First Nations co-investigator Professor Lyndon Ormond-Parker of RMIT said the shared networks matter because people can connect without burning through their own credit.
"Community Wi-Fi is making a real difference because people can connect without having to use their prepaid mobile data," Ormond-Parker said.
Household broadband is growing too. Thirty-two percent of respondents reported fixed broadband at home in 2026, and Starlink uptake jumped from 4% in 2025 to 24% in 2026 — a sixfold rise in a single year. Researchers credited promotional offers, discounted equipment and growing demand for home internet.
Featherstone, though, hedged on whether that growth will last. "Starlink is providing better household connectivity in many communities, but the challenge will be whether households can afford the service over the longer term," he said, noting that earlier postpaid services saw high default rates in low-income communities with many competing expenses.
How connected — and how affordable — is access?
On paper, connectivity looks close to universal: 98% of respondents reported having internet access, and 86% had used it within the previous day. Both figures mark significant improvements on earlier findings.
Daily life has moved online. In the previous month, 83% of respondents used online banking and 72% used government services.
Lauren Ganley, head of Telstra's First Nations Strategy & Engagement, said the findings show progress but also the limits of access alone. "Connectivity can be transformational for remote First Nations communities, but access alone is not enough. It needs to be affordable, reliable and designed around the needs of communities," she said.
"This research helps us understand where progress is being made and where the gaps remain. Telstra is proud to support this important work and, most importantly, to listen to communities as we work together to improve digital inclusion," Ganley said.
What's the catch?
Affordability. Surveyed households spend an average of $345 a month on mobile and internet services — a bill many urban families would balk at, paid out of often low remote incomes.
The trade-offs are stark: 83% of respondents said they sacrificed or cut back on essentials to afford internet access, and 69% compromised on data allowances or connection speeds to manage costs.
Ormond-Parker said the findings expose the difficult choices remote households face every month.
"Better connectivity is bringing clear benefits, but families should not have to cut back on essentials to afford internet access," he said. "Closing the digital gap requires long-term solutions developed with communities that reflect their needs and circumstances."
How was the study done?
The 2026 research ran across nine remote and very remote First Nations communities, seven of which were also surveyed in 2025. Researchers partnered with local First Nations organizations and community co-researchers to survey residents on how they access and use digital and media services.
The "Mapping the Digital Gap: 2026 Outcomes Report" is published by the ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society, RMIT University, Swinburne University of Technology and Telstra (DOI: 10.60836/ggns-vm61).
via phys.org/rss-feed/ (Source)
More from Nathan Brooks
Show full bio
Market editor covering companies, deals and strategy in general science news at SciBeat.
325 articles
Nearby plates
- The Data Centre Problem Bigger Than Water or Power: the Money
- Shield Space plans autonomous satellite-defense swarm tests
- NASA Picks Three Firms for Ka-Band Satellite Relay in $1 Billion Awards
- NASA Seeks Industry Proposals for Commercial Space Stations
- NASA Awards $38M Contract to Build 5G Network on the Moon