Plate Nº 81 · recorded November 13, 2026
Earth & ClimateReported finding
Rain may raise ocean carbon uptake by 13.6%, study finds
A 2026 Nature Geoscience model estimates rain raises ocean CO₂ uptake 13.6% versus wind-only calculations, while sparse near-surface measurements limit certainty.
By Nathan Brooks4 min read840 words
In brief
- The 2026 Nature Geoscience study estimates a 13.6% increase in modeled ocean CO₂ uptake versus wind-only exchange.
- The authors present a general 5%-15% range for possible carbon-budget underestimation, not a precise correction.
- Dilution contributes about 8% and wet deposition 3.8% relative to wind-driven exchange alone.
- Nearly 95% of SOCAT measurements occur at 5 meters, while observations capture about 30% of rain’s combined surface effect.
- Rain cooling could add up to about 2 percentage points, which the authors consider a likely upper bound.

A global model estimates that rain increases ocean carbon dioxide uptake by 13.6% compared with calculations based on wind alone, a 2026 Nature Geoscience study reports. Global carbon budgets, which track carbon’s movement among the atmosphere, ocean and land, may underestimate ocean absorption by roughly 5% to 15% because they do not fully account for rain.
How does rain make the ocean absorb more CO₂?
Rain boosts uptake through three linked processes. Its effect is measured against a baseline in which wind alone stirs the sea and drives gas exchange.
- Dilution: Rain lowers the salt concentration of surface water, changing its chemistry in ways that favor greater CO₂ uptake.
- Wet deposition: Rainwater transports dissolved CO₂ into the ocean.
- Turbulence: Rain-driven churning increases gas exchange between seawater and the atmosphere.
Dilution provides the largest share, about 8% relative to wind-driven exchange alone. Wet deposition adds 3.8%, while turbulence contributes little by itself but strengthens dilution when the processes coincide.
Carson Witte, a postdoctoral research scientist at Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, part of Columbia Climate School, said: “When we do global carbon accounting, we need to account for rain. It’s a big enough effect that getting it wrong biases our ocean carbon budgeting.”
What did the researchers model?
The team used RIM-3, a model that tracks how rainfall changes sea-surface salinity, or salt concentration, over time. It includes recent rainfall and the development of a fresher surface layer, and researchers checked it against satellite salinity observations.
They applied RIM-3 to rainfall and wind data from 2000 for ocean regions between 60° south and 60° north. A simpler method run on the same data produced an 8.4% estimate, close to the 7.7% upper estimate from a 2024 study.
That comparison suggests simpler approaches may underestimate rain’s contribution because they miss how thoroughly rain dilutes surface water. The main 13.6% calculation also excludes rain’s cooling effect, which could increase uptake further.
In a separate estimate, the researchers put cooling’s potential contribution at up to about 2 percentage points. They consider that value a likely upper bound rather than a central estimate.
Where does rain have the greatest effect?
The model found rain’s largest relative effect in the tropical Indian Ocean, where wind-driven CO₂ uptake is comparatively small. Across the tropics, rain offsets some CO₂ the ocean would otherwise release.
Rain also shifts ocean CO₂ exchange toward greater uptake, except in a small part of the eastern tropical Pacific.
Why do measurements miss part of the effect?
Rain creates fresher surface layers typically 1 to 3 meters, or 3 to 10 feet, deep. They can persist for hours near the surface unless winds mix them downward.
Nearly 95% of measurements in SOCAT, a leading ocean carbon database, come from 5 meters, or 16 feet, below the main zone of rain’s influence. Researchers estimate that current ocean carbon observations capture about 30% of rain’s combined effects on surface CO₂ exchange, including dilution and turbulence.
How certain is the 13.6% estimate?
The authors present 5% to 15% as a general guide for the possible budget underestimation, not a precise correction. The range reflects 2024 findings and other uncertainties, particularly uncertainty over how rain dilutes surface water.
Researchers cannot yet quantify that dilution effect with statistical confidence. The 13.6% figure compares RIM-3 with wind-driven exchange alone, while the 5% to 15% range accounts for rain effects already captured in existing ocean carbon measurements.
How did the work develop?
Project lead Christopher Zappa, a Lamont research professor, and University of Notre Dame’s Wade McGillis, who was at Lamont at the time, began studying ocean-atmosphere gas exchange in 2003. Experiments at Biosphere 2 in Arizona in 2003 and 2004 provided early evidence that rain-induced dilution could raise ocean carbon uptake.
Subsequent work by Zappa and McGillis demonstrated rain’s influence on CO₂ exchange in the western equatorial Pacific. That research laid the groundwork for the new global analysis.
What could change the estimate?
Future shifts in rainfall, wind, ocean CO₂ levels, temperature and salinity could raise or lower rain’s overall contribution, Zappa said. The outcome depends on how those changes overlap geographically.
“The dilution due to rain itself will always work to increase the uptake by the ocean,” Zappa said.
Quantifying rain’s contribution requires better knowledge of how rain and wind mix surface waters and how the layered, fresher water left by precipitation evolves. Zappa said researchers also need to understand longer-term ventilation, meaning the movement of deeper water toward the surface.
More measurements of near-surface salinity and rainfall, especially in equatorial oceans, could narrow those gaps. Direct measurements of air-sea CO₂ exchange during and after rain would also help determine how much the ocean absorbs.
Carson R. Witte and colleagues published “Global carbon dioxide flux into the surface ocean intensified by rain-induced dilution” in Nature Geoscience in 2026. The DOI is 10.1038/s41561-026-02112-z.
via phys.org/rss-feed/ (Source)
More from Nathan Brooks
Show full bio
Market editor covering companies, deals and strategy in general science news at SciBeat.
338 articles
Nearby plates
- Ice Ages May Have Started With a Pole-to-Pole Ocean Chain Reaction
- Weddell Sea deep water carries stable organic carbon, study finds
- Global Fossil CO₂ Emissions Set to Fall 0.4% in 2026, Report Says
- Global Fossil CO2 Set to Fall 0.4% in 2026 – But Wars, Not Clean Energy, Drive It
- Droughts Can Flip Forests From Carbon Sinks to Carbon Sources